Washington, April 9 : The Hindu American Foundation (HAF) has approached a US appeals court, arguing that Californiaâ??s civil rights regulator has wrongly linked caste discrimination to Hinduism and targeted Indian and South Asian communities, in a case that could shape how caste is addressed in US workplaces.

In a reply brief filed on April 6 before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, HAF urged the court to remove what it called procedural hurdles that led a lower court to dismiss its lawsuit against the California Civil Rights Department (CRD). The foundation said the district court erred by not examining the substance of its claims.

HAF argues that the CRDâ??s enforcement approach â??explicitly and implicitly links â??casteâ?? to Hinduism and people of Indian or South Asian descent,â?? effectively singling out a minority community.

The case traces back to a high-profile complaint filed by the CRD against Cisco Systems and two managers, alleging caste-based discrimination. The regulator publicly stated it had â??Sue(d) Cisco Systems, Inc. and Former Managers For Caste-Based Discriminationâ?? and filed action under Californiaâ??s Fair Employment and Housing Act.

According to HAF, the CRD â??doubled downâ?? on its theory that Cisco should have prevented caste discrimination â??occurring within its South Asian Indian workforce.â?? The foundation noted that the term â??casteâ?? appears repeatedly in the agencyâ??s active complaint.

HAF contends that the CRDâ??s framing relied on â??racist and demonstrably false tropesâ?? about Indians and Hindus. It cited the departmentâ??s earlier claim that â??Indiaâ??s caste systemâ?? is â??a strict Hindu social and religious hierarchy.â??

The CRD has since removed that phrasing and argued that the issue is now moot. But HAF maintains that the core problem persists.

â??Removing the phrase â??Hindu social and religious hierarchyâ?? doesnâ??t change the fact that the CRD is attempting to direct â??casteâ?? policies solely at the companyâ??s Indian, South Asian, and Hindu workforce,â?? the foundation said.

Needhy Shah, HAF Senior Legal Director, warned that the implications extend beyond a single case.

â??The Hindu American, Indian American, and South Asian American communities are concerned, and if they arenâ??t, they should be,â?? Shah said.

â??The CRD is attempting to wield its enforcement powers by singling out the very minority groups it is charged to protect. Californians are paying attention, and so are employers and businesses regulated by the CRD,â?? Shah added.

She further said, â??The CRD is playing caste cop, blaming caste discrimination on Hinduism, and itâ??s only a matter of time until they identify their next Hindu target.â??

HAF is represented by lead counsel Tim Travelstead of Narayan Travelstead Ku P.C.

The Ninth Circuitâ??s decision on whether to revive the case could have broader implications for how US civil rights law interprets caste and its association with religion or ethnicity, particularly for Indian-origin communities.

Caste has emerged as a contentious issue in parts of the United States, especially in technology sector workplaces with significant South Asian representation. Some advocacy groups have pushed for explicit caste protections, while others argue such measures risk stereotyping entire communities.

/IANS